Twitter and Snap could be M&A birds of a feather

WASHINGTON, July 22 (Reuters Breakingviews) – Twitter (TWTR.N) and Snap share some common problems. If they’re smart, they could share much more, as merger partners – provided Twitter can tie up its loose ends with fickle suitor Elon Musk read more .

Twitter reported a surprising decline in second-quarter revenue on Friday, even though the US economy hasn’t yet fully hit the brakes. Its revenue shrank 1% to $1.2 billion, which it blamed on advertisers worrying about a potential recession. Snap had a similar experience. The disappearing message app missed the second-quarter revenue forecast it had already cut in May.

Both are still succeeding in pleasing the masses. Twitter’s average monetizable daily active users grew at a decent 17% to almost 240 million. Snap’s daily active user base increased 18% to 347 million. But separately they’re too small to woo advertisers the way that rivals like Alphabet (GOOGL.O) and Meta Platforms can. Twitter is also struggling to steady the ship in the wake of its sale to Musk for $44 billion, a merger which has now descended into legal acrimony after the Tesla boss got cold feet.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to

What if the two flocked together? Merging Twitter and Snap, which offer complementary products, would allow them to pool their spending power, especially if they can cut ballooning costs. Together they would have about $11 billion in cash and cash-like investments; still less than Meta’s $45 billion in the first quarter, but enough to have a fighting chance. Twitter could add to its cash pile by striking a settlement with Musk.

The timing is also favorable. At its peak last year, Snap read more had a market capitalization of more than $120 billion, far higher than Twitter’s. But its pandemic gloss has rubbed off. The firm co-founded by Evan Spiegel was worth around $16 billion on Friday, whereas Twitter, even after a slight post-earnings fall, was worth $30 billion. Spiegel controls Snap’s shareholder votes, but that could be an advantage: offer him the chance to run the whole merged company, and it might reduce the premium Twitter would have to pay. He may also be a more effective leader than Twitter’s new, relatively unproven Chief Executive Parag Agrawal.

It wouldn’t be the first time a failed takeover has turned into a better one. Think of telecoms firm T-Mobile US (TMUS.O), which got a $6 billion payout in cash and spectrum from rival AT&T (TN) as compensation for their nixed merger, and later bought Sprint. Twitter could do something similar: feather its nest with some of Musk’s cash, and then lure a more suitable mate.

Follow @GinaChon on Twitter

(The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.)


Social network Twitter said on July 22 that second-quarter revenue declined 1% to $1.2 billion. Analysts expected revenue of just over $1.3 billion, according to Refinitiv.

Separately, disappearing messaging app Snap said on July 21 that second-quarter revenue grew 13% to $1.1 billion roughly in line with analyst estimates.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to

Editing by John Foley and Sharon Lam

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.


Leave a Comment